Spirits and stars · Neutral · catalogued, not judged
A widely circulated set of day pillars for which our classical corpus yields no explicit rule.
Full-text search across our local corpus (San Ming Tong Hui, both editions; Shenfeng Tongkao; Yuanhai Ziping; Qinding Xiejibianfangshu; Yuxia Ji) returns no entry for "Ten Numinous".
Source: (No classical source found)
Widely circulated, but of unclear origin; under our evidence-first rule we do not judge it.
Our rule here is simple: a rule must be traceable to the classics, and if we cannot find it we would rather not include it. "Ten Numinous" is not to be found in the five classical works we hold.
Not judged: no explicit classical rule available.
Rule of thumb: these markers are read from fixed classical tables, and the scores and advice come from a separate model. Both are laid out on the site, and neither is a claim about what will happen.
These readings follow the traditional Chinese system (BaZi / Zi Wei Dou Shu) and describe how the classics read a chart. They are not predictions and not medical, legal or financial advice, and no outcome is promised.
You list ten day pillars without a rule. Is that not an omission?
It is deliberate. A rule has to be traceable to our classical corpus; when we cannot find it we say so rather than invent one.
Can you tell me whether my chart has one of these days?
No. Without a settled rule there is nothing to look up, so no chart is marked with it and no score changes.